• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Archives for Climate Science / Greenhouse gases

Greenhouse gases

2012 Updates to model-observation comparisons

7 Feb 2013 by Gavin

Time for the 2012 updates!

As has become a habit (2009, 2010, 2011), here is a brief overview and update of some of the most discussed model/observation comparisons, updated to include 2012. I include comparisons of surface temperatures, sea ice and ocean heat content to the CMIP3 and Hansen et al (1988) simulations.
[Read more…] about 2012 Updates to model-observation comparisons

Filed Under: Aerosols, Arctic and Antarctic, Climate modelling, Climate Science, El Nino, Greenhouse gases, Instrumental Record, Model-Obs Comparisons

El Nino’s effect on CO2 causes confusion about CO2’s role for climate change

11 Sep 2012 by rasmus

Are the rising atmospheric CO2-levels a result of oceans warming up? And does that mean that CO2 has little role in the global warming? Moreover, are the rising levels of CO2 at all related to human activity?

These are claims made in a fresh publication by Humlum et al. (2012). However, when seeing them in the context of their analysis, they seem to be on par with the misguided notion that the rain from clouds cannot come from the oceans because the clouds are intermittent and highly variable whereas the oceans are just there all the time. I think that the analysis presented in Humlum et al. (2012) is weak on four important accounts: the analysis, the physics, reviewing past literature, and logic.

[Read more…] about El Nino’s effect on CO2 causes confusion about CO2’s role for climate change

References

  1. O. Humlum, K. Stordahl, and J. Solheim, "The phase relation between atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperature", Global and Planetary Change, vol. 100, pp. 51-69, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.08.008

Filed Under: Carbon cycle, Climate impacts, Climate Science, Greenhouse gases, statistics

Evaluating a 1981 temperature projection

2 Apr 2012 by group

Guest commentary from Geert Jan van Oldenborgh and Rein Haarsma, KNMI

Sometimes it helps to take a step back from the everyday pressures of research (falling ill helps). It was in this way we stumbled across Hansen et al (1981) (pdf). In 1981 the first author of this post was in his first year at university and the other just entered the KNMI after finishing his masters. Global warming was not yet an issue at the KNMI where the focus was much more on climate variability, which explains why the article of Hansen et al. was unnoticed at that time by the second author. It turns out to be a very interesting read.
[Read more…] about Evaluating a 1981 temperature projection

References

  1. J. Hansen, D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, "Climate Impact of Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide", Science, vol. 213, pp. 957-966, 1981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.213.4511.957

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, Greenhouse gases, Instrumental Record

Sherwood Rowland, CFCs, ozone depletion and the public role of scientists

13 Mar 2012 by group

Many of you will have read the obituaries of the Nobel Prize-winning chemist Sherwood Rowland (Nature, BBC) who sadly died over the weekend. DotEarth has a good collection of links to papers, videos and tributes.
[Read more…] about Sherwood Rowland, CFCs, ozone depletion and the public role of scientists

Filed Under: Climate Science, Greenhouse gases

2011 Updates to model-data comparisons

8 Feb 2012 by Gavin

And so it goes – another year, another annual data point. As has become a habit (2009, 2010), here is a brief overview and update of some of the most relevant model/data comparisons. We include the standard comparisons of surface temperatures, sea ice and ocean heat content to the AR4 and 1988 Hansen et al simulations.
[Read more…] about 2011 Updates to model-data comparisons

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, El Nino, Greenhouse gases, Instrumental Record, Model-Obs Comparisons

The dog is the weather

17 Jan 2012 by rasmus

Update January 27: There is also another recent dog-based animations from Victoria (southeast Australia) explaining some of the key drivers of our climate and how some are changing.

A TV series that ran on Norwegian TV (NRK) last year included a simple and fun cartoon that demonstrates some important concepts relative to weather and climate:

In the animation, the man’s path can be considered as analogous to a directional climatic change, while the path traced by his dog’s whimsical movements represent weather fluctuations, as constrained by the man’s path, the leash, and the dog’s moment-by-moment decisions of what seems important to investigate in his small world. What might the leash length represent? The man’s momentary pause? The dog’s exact route relative to concepts of random variation? The messages in this animation are similar to the recent results of Grant Foster and Stefan Rahmstorf in ERL (see post here).

We’d also like to praise the TV-series ‘Siffer‘, hosted by an enthusiastic statistician explaining how most things in our world relate to mathematics. The series covers a range of subjects, for instance gambling theory, the Tragedy of the Commons, anecdotes about mathematical riddles, medical statistics, and construction design; it even answers why champagne from a large bottle tastes better than that from a smaller one. There is also an episode devoted to weather forecasting and climate.

Success in understanding our universe often depends on how the ‘story’ about it is told, and a big part of that often involves how mental images are presented. Mathematics and statistics can describe nature in great detail and “elegance”, but they are often difficult and inaccessible to the average person. Conversely, the man-and-dog animation is intuitive and easy to comprehend. Similarly, Hans Rosling’s Fun with Stats provides some very nice demonstrations of how to convey meaning via the creative display of numbers.

Filed Under: Climate impacts, Communicating Climate, El Nino, Greenhouse gases, Tutorials

An Arctic methane worst-case scenario

7 Jan 2012 by david

Let’s suppose that the Arctic started to degas methane 100 times faster than it is today. I just made that number up trying to come up with a blow-the-doors-off surprise, something like the ozone hole. We ran the numbers to get an idea of how the climate impact of an Arctic Methane Nasty Surprise would stack up to that from Business-as-Usual rising CO2

[Read more…] about An Arctic methane worst-case scenario

Filed Under: Arctic and Antarctic, Carbon cycle, Climate Science, Greenhouse gases

Copernicus and Arrhenius: Physics Then and Physics Today

21 Dec 2011 by eric

There was a really interesting article in Physics Today this past October on the parallels between the slow acceptance of the idea of anthropogenic climate change and of the idea that the earth circles the sun.
[Read more…] about Copernicus and Arrhenius: Physics Then and Physics Today

Filed Under: Climate Science, Greenhouse gases, Scientific practice, skeptics

The high cost of inaction

14 Oct 2011 by Jim

In 2004 Stephen Pacala and Robert Socolow published a paper in Science in which they argued that a pragmatic, but still difficult, way of stabilizing atmospheric CO2 levels over the long term was via the implementation of seven “stabilization wedges” over the next 50 years. The idea was very simple: each wedge represented one in-hand technology or societal practice that could be implemented, relatively slowly at first and increasing linearly with time, to make a small but growing dent in the rise in CO2 emissions, stabilizing them at 2004 levels (about 7 Gigatons C/Year) over the next 50 years (see figure below).
[Read more…] about The high cost of inaction

Filed Under: Greenhouse gases

Volcanic vs. Anthropogenic CO2

4 Aug 2011 by group

Guest Commentary by Terry Gerlach*

TV screen images of erupting and exploding volcanoes spewing forth emissions are typically spectacular, awesome, and vividly suggestive of huge additions of gas to the atmosphere. By comparison, the smokestack and exhaust pipe venting of anthropogenic emissions is comparatively unexciting, unimpressive, and commonplace. Consequently, it easy to get traction with the general public for claims that volcanic CO2 emissions are far greater than those of human activities, or that the CO2 released in some recent or ongoing eruption exceeds anthropogenic releases in all of human history, or that the threat of a future super-eruption makes concerns about our carbon footprint laughable. The evidence from volcanology, however, does not support these claims.
[Read more…] about Volcanic vs. Anthropogenic CO2

Filed Under: Climate Science, Greenhouse gases

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 16
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Are direct water vapor emissions endangering anyone?
  • The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?
  • National Climate Assessment links
  • Ocean circulation going South?

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Keith Woollard on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Scott on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • patrick o twentyseven on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • patrick o twentyseven on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Radge Havers on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • David on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • David on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • David on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • nigelj on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Keith Woollard on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Keith Woollard on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Gavin on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • nigelj on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Radge Havers on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • John Pollack on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • John Pollack on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Ray Ladbury on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,375 posts

11 pages

246,225 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.