• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Archives for Featured Story

Featured Story

The Future of Climate Modeling?

26 Mar 2022 by Gavin

There was an interesting workshop last week focused on the Future of Climate Modelling. It was run by the World Climate Research Program (WCRP) Core Project on Earth System Modelling and Observations (ESMO) which is part of a bewildering alphabet soup of various advisory committees that exist for mostly unclear historical reasons. This one actually does something useful – namely it helps organize the CMIP activities that many modeling groups contribute to (which inform the assessment reports like IPCC and various national Climate Assessments). They had a wide variety of people and perspectives to discuss the changing landscape of climate modeling and what people want from these models. You won’t agree with everything, but it was informative.

[Read more…] about The Future of Climate Modeling?

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, Featured Story, Scientific practice Tagged With: CMIP, WCRP

The end of blog comments?

25 Mar 2022 by group

Over the last decade, commenting has dramatically moved from specific web-sites to general social media platforms, radically changing how people interact with longer-form content (such as blogs, substacks, newspapers and journalism). No single site can compete with the breadth of audience and engagement that is found on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit etc. This has led to a very clear reduction in the quality of comments on more specialized sites (like RealClimate), as many of you have observed. This is not a problem that appears amenable to stricter moderation.

We are therefore leaning towards suspending comment and open threads on the blog. Feel free to comment on this decision below. If the discussion is good and substantive, it will weigh towards the continuation of the commenting facility. Contrariwise, if it is shallow and unnecessarily hostile, then it is likely to be the last comment thread on this blog. We would still post articles, but anticipate that commentary and criticism will be hosted elsewhere.

As a replacement, we are happy to explore ways to better link to relevant discussions on social media – suggestions for plugins/methods are welcome.

Filed Under: Comment Policy, Featured Story

Making predictions with the CMIP6 ensemble

1 Dec 2021 by Gavin

The CMIP6 multi-model ensemble is a unique resource with input from scientists and modeling groups from around the world. [CMIP stands for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, and it is now in its 6th Phase]. But as we’ve discussed before (#NotAllModels) there are some specific issues that require users to be cautious in making predictions. Fortunately, there are useful ‘best practices’ that can help avoid the worst pitfalls.

A new paper by McCrystall et al that has just appeared in Nature Communications illustrates these issues clearly by having some excellent analyses of the changes in Arctic precipitation regimes at different global warming levels, and examining the sensitivity of their metrics to both local and Arctic warming, but unfortunately relying on the CMIP6 multi-model mean for their headline statements and press release.

[Read more…] about Making predictions with the CMIP6 ensemble

References

  1. M.R. McCrystall, J. Stroeve, M. Serreze, B.C. Forbes, and J.A. Screen, "New climate models reveal faster and larger increases in Arctic precipitation than previously projected", Nature Communications, vol. 12, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27031-y

Filed Under: Climate impacts, Climate modelling, Climate Science, Featured Story, IPCC Tagged With: Arctic, Arctic amplification, greenhouse warming

Net Zero/Not Zero

20 Nov 2021 by Gavin

At the COP26 gathering last week much of the discussion related to “Net-Zero” goals. This concept derives from important physical science results highlighted in the Special Report on 1.5ºC and more thoroughly in the last IPCC report that future warming is tied to future emissions, and that warming will effectively cease only once anthropogenic CO2 emissions are balanced by anthropogenic CO2 removals. But some activists have (rightly) pointed out that large-scale CO2 removals are as yet untested, and so reliance on them to any significant extent to balance out emissions is akin not really committing to net zero at all. Their point is that “net-zero” is not zero and hence will serve as a smokescreen for insufficient climate action. To help sort this out some background might be helpful.

[Read more…] about Net Zero/Not Zero

Filed Under: Carbon cycle, Climate modelling, Climate Science, Featured Story, IPCC

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Unforced Variations: Aug 2025
  • Are direct water vapor emissions endangering anyone?

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Nick Palmer on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Silvia Leahu-Aluas on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Karsten V. Johansen on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Susan Anderson on Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Karsten V. Johansen on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Joseph O'Sullivan on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Ken Towe on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Kevin McKinney on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Kevin McKinney on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • JCM on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Rory Allen on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • MA Rodger on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • David on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Piotr on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • David on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • MA Rodger on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Olbers on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Mr. Know It All on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Nick Palmer on Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Russell Seitz on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Ron R. on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,378 posts

11 pages

246,313 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.